Skip to main content
LITERATURE REVIEW · HEAD-TO-HEAD RCT

SURPASS-2

Frías et al., New England Journal of Medicine, 2021. 40-week head-to-head randomised trial of once-weekly Tirzepatide (5, 10 and 15 mg) versus once-weekly Semaglutide 1 mg in adults with type 2 diabetes on metformin.

QUICK ANSWER
TL;DR

Quick answer

SURPASS-2 was a 40-week randomised open-label head-to-head Phase 3 trial comparing once-weekly Tirzepatide 5, 10 and 15 mg with once-weekly Semaglutide 1 mg in 1,879 adults with type 2 diabetes on background metformin. Tirzepatide produced greater HbA1c reduction and greater body-weight reduction than Semaglutide 1 mg.
EXTENDED ANSWER
AI-ready

Extended answer

What was the SURPASS-2 trial?

SURPASS-2 was a 40-week, randomised, open-label, head-to-head Phase 3 trial comparing once-weekly subcutaneous Tirzepatide (5, 10 and 15 mg) with once-weekly subcutaneous Semaglutide 1 mg in adults with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy. Published by Frías and colleagues in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2021, the trial randomised 1,879 participants 1:1:1:1. All three Tirzepatide doses produced greater HbA1c reduction than Semaglutide 1 mg (approximately −2.01% to −2.30% vs −1.86%) and greater body-weight reduction (approximately −7.6 kg to −11.2 kg vs −5.7 kg) at week 40. SURPASS-2 is the reference head-to-head comparison of a dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist with a mono-GLP-1 receptor agonist in type 2 diabetes.
KEY FACTS

Key facts

Compounds
Tirzepatide 5/10/15 mg vs Semaglutide 1 mg (SC weekly)
Design
Randomised, open-label, active-controlled, Phase 3
N
1,879
Population
Adults with T2D on metformin
Duration
40 weeks
Primary outcome
Change in HbA1c from baseline
Journal
New England Journal of Medicine (2021)
DOI
10.1056/NEJMoa2107519
PMID
34170647

Background

Semaglutide 1 mg once weekly was, at the time, a leading GLP-1 receptor agonist for glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes. SURPASS-2 was designed as the direct randomised head-to-head comparison of Tirzepatide with Semaglutide 1 mg on background metformin. [1]

Study design

Randomised, open-label, active-controlled, four-arm parallel-group Phase 3 trial. Participants were randomised 1:1:1:1 to Tirzepatide 5 mg, Tirzepatide 10 mg, Tirzepatide 15 mg or Semaglutide 1 mg, each administered subcutaneously once weekly for 40 weeks alongside stable metformin.

Population

1,879 adults with type 2 diabetes and HbA1c 7.0–10.5% on metformin (≥1500 mg/day).

Intervention

Once-weekly subcutaneous Tirzepatide titrated to 5, 10 or 15 mg.

Comparator

Once-weekly subcutaneous Semaglutide titrated to 1 mg.

Primary endpoints

Mean change in HbA1c from baseline to week 40, tested for non-inferiority and superiority of each Tirzepatide dose vs Semaglutide 1 mg.

Secondary endpoints

Body-weight reduction, proportions achieving HbA1c targets (<7%, <5.7%), fasting glucose, insulin resistance markers, safety and tolerability.

Key findings

  • Mean HbA1c reduction from baseline was approximately −2.01% (5 mg), −2.24% (10 mg) and −2.30% (15 mg) with Tirzepatide versus approximately −1.86% with Semaglutide 1 mg.
  • All three Tirzepatide doses met non-inferiority and superiority criteria vs Semaglutide 1 mg for HbA1c reduction.
  • Mean body-weight reduction was approximately −7.6 kg (5 mg), −9.3 kg (10 mg) and −11.2 kg (15 mg) with Tirzepatide versus approximately −5.7 kg with Semaglutide 1 mg.
  • Gastrointestinal adverse events were the dominant tolerability finding across both compounds, predominantly during dose titration.

Mechanistic significance

  • Consistent with the hypothesis that dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonism produces a broader incretin response than mono-GLP-1 receptor agonism.
  • Provides the first direct randomised comparison against Semaglutide and remains a reference dataset for subsequent triple-agonist (Retatrutide) contextualisation.

Limitations

Research limitations

  • Open-label design may introduce behavioural bias despite blinded outcome assessment for laboratory endpoints.
  • Semaglutide comparator dose was the licensed diabetes dose (1 mg), not the weight-management dose (2.4 mg). Cross-dose comparisons require care.
  • 40-week duration is short relative to lifelong glycaemic management.

Research context

SURPASS-2 is the anchor head-to-head trial for Tirzepatide vs Semaglutide in type 2 diabetes and is the reference used across the incretin literature when contextualising later dual and triple-agonist trials.

Research-use framing

This is an educational literature summary of a published clinical trial. Oxford Research Peptides supplies Tirzepatide as a lyophilised reference standard for in-vitro laboratory research only. Nothing on this page is medical advice.

References1

  1. 1.

    Frías JP, Davies MJ, Rosenstock J, et al.. Tirzepatide versus semaglutide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes (SURPASS-2).. New England Journal of Medicine. 2021;385(6):503-515.

EVIDENCE SUMMARY
Evidence

Evidence summary

Strong evidence
Research confidenceHigh confidence
Peer-reviewed head-to-head Phase 3 randomised trial published in the New England Journal of Medicine (Frías et al. 2021).
EDITORIAL NOTICE

Research use only

All materials referenced are supplied strictly for in-vitro laboratory research. Not for human or animal consumption, diagnosis, or therapeutic use.
VERSION HISTORY
Editorial Team
Oxford Research Peptides Editorial Team
In-house editorial staff
Oxford Research Peptides
Scientific Reviewer
Scientific Review Panel
Independent scientific review
Oxford Research Peptides

Publication information

Published
2026-11-01
Updated
2026-11-01
Reviewed
2026-11-01
Version
1.0

Revision history

  1. v1.02026-11-01· Editorial Team

    Research Literature Programme 1 — initial publication of dedicated STEP, SURPASS and Retatrutide Phase 2 trial summaries.

Editorial standards

Content is reviewed against our editorial process for scientific accuracy, sourcing, and clarity. Read our editorial standards.

Conflict of interest

Oxford Research Peptides supplies research-grade reference peptides commercially. Editorial pages are drafted and reviewed to describe published scientific literature accurately and do not recommend, promote or endorse any specific commercial product. Product mentions on educational pages are strictly for cross-referencing catalogue entries.

Next scheduled review: 2028-05-01. Our research methodology describes how the review is conducted.

Research use only

All materials referenced are supplied strictly for in-vitro laboratory research. Not for human or animal consumption, diagnosis, or therapeutic use.
Published: 2026-11-01Updated: 2026-11-01