Skip to main content
LITERATURE REVIEW · HEAD-TO-HEAD RCT

STEP-8

Rubino et al., JAMA, 2022. 68-week head-to-head randomised trial comparing once-weekly subcutaneous Semaglutide 2.4 mg with once-daily subcutaneous Liraglutide 3.0 mg in adults with overweight or obesity without diabetes.

QUICK ANSWER
TL;DR

Quick answer

STEP-8 was a 68-week, 338-participant randomised open-label head-to-head trial comparing once-weekly Semaglutide 2.4 mg with once-daily Liraglutide 3.0 mg (both plus placebo for the alternate regimen) in adults with overweight or obesity without diabetes. Semaglutide produced approximately −15.8% weight change versus approximately −6.4% with Liraglutide.
EXTENDED ANSWER
AI-ready

Extended answer

What was the STEP-8 trial?

STEP-8 was a 68-week, randomised, open-label head-to-head Phase 3 trial comparing once-weekly subcutaneous Semaglutide 2.4 mg with once-daily subcutaneous Liraglutide 3.0 mg for weight management in adults with overweight or obesity without diabetes. Published by Rubino and colleagues in JAMA in 2022, the trial randomised 338 participants 3:1:3:1 to Semaglutide + placebo (daily), Liraglutide + placebo (weekly), Semaglutide alone or Liraglutide alone. Semaglutide produced mean weight change of approximately −15.8% versus approximately −6.4% with Liraglutide at week 68 — the first large randomised head-to-head comparison of two GLP-1 receptor agonists at their licensed weight-management doses. STEP-8 is a central data point in comparative research on GLP-1 receptor agonists.
KEY FACTS

Key facts

Compounds
Semaglutide 2.4 mg SC weekly vs Liraglutide 3.0 mg SC daily
Design
Randomised, open-label, active-controlled, double-dummy for placebo alternate
N
338
Population
Adults with overweight/obesity, without diabetes
Duration
68 weeks
Primary outcome
Percent change in body weight from baseline
Journal
JAMA (2022)
DOI
10.1001/jama.2021.23619
PMID
35015037

Background

Prior to STEP-8, comparisons of Semaglutide 2.4 mg and Liraglutide 3.0 mg relied on cross-trial inference. STEP-8 was designed as the direct randomised head-to-head comparison at their respective licensed weight-management doses. [1]

Study design

Randomised, open-label with double-dummy placebo for the alternate regimen, active-controlled Phase 3 trial. Participants received either once-weekly subcutaneous Semaglutide 2.4 mg plus daily placebo or once-daily subcutaneous Liraglutide 3.0 mg plus weekly placebo, both with lifestyle intervention, for 68 weeks.

Population

338 adults with a body-mass index of at least 30, or at least 27 with a weight-related coexisting condition, without diabetes.

Intervention

Once-weekly subcutaneous Semaglutide titrated to 2.4 mg maintenance dose plus lifestyle intervention.

Comparator

Once-daily subcutaneous Liraglutide titrated to 3.0 mg maintenance dose plus lifestyle intervention.

Primary endpoints

Percent change in body weight from baseline to week 68 (Semaglutide vs Liraglutide).

Secondary endpoints

Proportions achieving ≥5%, ≥10%, ≥15% and ≥20% weight reduction; treatment discontinuation, tolerability, waist circumference and cardiometabolic parameters.

Key findings

  • Mean change in body weight was approximately −15.8% with Semaglutide 2.4 mg versus approximately −6.4% with Liraglutide 3.0 mg at week 68.
  • A substantially greater proportion of Semaglutide-treated participants achieved ≥10%, ≥15% and ≥20% weight reduction.
  • Gastrointestinal adverse events were common in both arms and predominated during titration.
  • Trial discontinuation for adverse events was numerically higher with Liraglutide than with Semaglutide.

Mechanistic significance

  • Consistent with pharmacokinetic differences (weekly Semaglutide vs daily Liraglutide) and reported potency differences at the GLP-1 receptor.
  • Provides the first randomised, direct comparison used across the literature to contextualise dual-agonist (Tirzepatide, SURPASS-2) and triple-agonist (Retatrutide) head-to-head signals.

Limitations

Research limitations

  • Open-label design (with double-dummy) may introduce behavioural bias despite placebo blinding of the alternate regimen.
  • 68-week duration is short relative to the chronic nature of obesity.
  • Trial did not evaluate cardiovascular or renal outcomes.

Research context

STEP-8 is the reference head-to-head Semaglutide-vs-Liraglutide dataset in the incretin agonist literature and complements SURPASS-2 (Tirzepatide-vs-Semaglutide in type 2 diabetes) as a bridge between mono-, dual- and triple-agonist comparative evidence.

Research-use framing

This is an educational literature summary of a published clinical trial. Oxford Research Peptides supplies Semaglutide as a lyophilised reference standard for in-vitro laboratory research only. Nothing on this page is medical advice.

References1

  1. 1.

    Rubino DM, Greenway FL, Khalid U, et al.. Effect of weekly subcutaneous semaglutide vs daily liraglutide on body weight in adults with overweight or obesity without diabetes (STEP 8).. JAMA. 2022;327(2):138-150.

EVIDENCE SUMMARY
Evidence

Evidence summary

Strong evidence
Research confidenceHigh confidence
Peer-reviewed head-to-head Phase 3 randomised trial published in JAMA (Rubino et al. 2022).
EDITORIAL NOTICE

Research use only

All materials referenced are supplied strictly for in-vitro laboratory research. Not for human or animal consumption, diagnosis, or therapeutic use.
VERSION HISTORY
Editorial Team
Oxford Research Peptides Editorial Team
In-house editorial staff
Oxford Research Peptides
Scientific Reviewer
Scientific Review Panel
Independent scientific review
Oxford Research Peptides

Publication information

Published
2026-11-01
Updated
2026-11-01
Reviewed
2026-11-01
Version
1.0

Revision history

  1. v1.02026-11-01· Editorial Team

    Research Literature Programme 1 — initial publication of dedicated STEP, SURPASS and Retatrutide Phase 2 trial summaries.

Editorial standards

Content is reviewed against our editorial process for scientific accuracy, sourcing, and clarity. Read our editorial standards.

Conflict of interest

Oxford Research Peptides supplies research-grade reference peptides commercially. Editorial pages are drafted and reviewed to describe published scientific literature accurately and do not recommend, promote or endorse any specific commercial product. Product mentions on educational pages are strictly for cross-referencing catalogue entries.

Next scheduled review: 2028-05-01. Our research methodology describes how the review is conducted.

Research use only

All materials referenced are supplied strictly for in-vitro laboratory research. Not for human or animal consumption, diagnosis, or therapeutic use.
Published: 2026-11-01Updated: 2026-11-01