Quick answer
Extended answer
What was the STEP-8 trial?
Key facts
- Compounds
- Semaglutide 2.4 mg SC weekly vs Liraglutide 3.0 mg SC daily
- Design
- Randomised, open-label, active-controlled, double-dummy for placebo alternate
- N
- 338
- Population
- Adults with overweight/obesity, without diabetes
- Duration
- 68 weeks
- Primary outcome
- Percent change in body weight from baseline
- Journal
- JAMA (2022)
- DOI
- 10.1001/jama.2021.23619
- PMID
- 35015037
Background
Prior to STEP-8, comparisons of Semaglutide 2.4 mg and Liraglutide 3.0 mg relied on cross-trial inference. STEP-8 was designed as the direct randomised head-to-head comparison at their respective licensed weight-management doses. [1]
Study design
Randomised, open-label with double-dummy placebo for the alternate regimen, active-controlled Phase 3 trial. Participants received either once-weekly subcutaneous Semaglutide 2.4 mg plus daily placebo or once-daily subcutaneous Liraglutide 3.0 mg plus weekly placebo, both with lifestyle intervention, for 68 weeks.
Population
338 adults with a body-mass index of at least 30, or at least 27 with a weight-related coexisting condition, without diabetes.
Intervention
Once-weekly subcutaneous Semaglutide titrated to 2.4 mg maintenance dose plus lifestyle intervention.
Comparator
Once-daily subcutaneous Liraglutide titrated to 3.0 mg maintenance dose plus lifestyle intervention.
Primary endpoints
Percent change in body weight from baseline to week 68 (Semaglutide vs Liraglutide).
Secondary endpoints
Proportions achieving ≥5%, ≥10%, ≥15% and ≥20% weight reduction; treatment discontinuation, tolerability, waist circumference and cardiometabolic parameters.
Key findings
- Mean change in body weight was approximately −15.8% with Semaglutide 2.4 mg versus approximately −6.4% with Liraglutide 3.0 mg at week 68.
- A substantially greater proportion of Semaglutide-treated participants achieved ≥10%, ≥15% and ≥20% weight reduction.
- Gastrointestinal adverse events were common in both arms and predominated during titration.
- Trial discontinuation for adverse events was numerically higher with Liraglutide than with Semaglutide.
Mechanistic significance
- Consistent with pharmacokinetic differences (weekly Semaglutide vs daily Liraglutide) and reported potency differences at the GLP-1 receptor.
- Provides the first randomised, direct comparison used across the literature to contextualise dual-agonist (Tirzepatide, SURPASS-2) and triple-agonist (Retatrutide) head-to-head signals.
Limitations
Research limitations
- Open-label design (with double-dummy) may introduce behavioural bias despite placebo blinding of the alternate regimen.
- 68-week duration is short relative to the chronic nature of obesity.
- Trial did not evaluate cardiovascular or renal outcomes.
Research context
STEP-8 is the reference head-to-head Semaglutide-vs-Liraglutide dataset in the incretin agonist literature and complements SURPASS-2 (Tirzepatide-vs-Semaglutide in type 2 diabetes) as a bridge between mono-, dual- and triple-agonist comparative evidence.
Research-use framing
- STEP-1 (obesity)
- STEP-2 (obesity + T2D)
- STEP-3 (intensive behavioural therapy)
- STEP-4 (maintenance / withdrawal)
- STEP-5 (two-year)
- STEP programme overview
- SURPASS-1 (monotherapy)
- SURPASS-2 (vs semaglutide)
- SURPASS-3 (vs insulin degludec)
- SURPASS-4 (vs insulin glargine, high CV risk)
- SURPASS-5 (add-on to basal insulin)
References1
- 1.
Rubino DM, Greenway FL, Khalid U, et al.. Effect of weekly subcutaneous semaglutide vs daily liraglutide on body weight in adults with overweight or obesity without diabetes (STEP 8).. JAMA. 2022;327(2):138-150.
Evidence summary
- What is Semaglutide?
Beginner-friendly research-focused introduction to Semaglutide — a long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonist derived from native GLP-1(7-37).
- Semaglutide Mechanism of Action
Receptor-level explanation of Semaglutide's activity at GLP-1R — Gαs / cAMP / PKA / EPAC2 signalling, β-arrestin recruitment, insulinotropic and glucagonostatic effects, gastric emptying and central appetite modulation.
- Semaglutide FAQ
Comprehensive research-focused FAQ on Semaglutide — identity, receptor pharmacology, structural modifications, pharmacokinetics, laboratory handling, evidence base and regulatory status.
- Semaglutide Pharmacokinetics
Reported pharmacokinetics of Semaglutide — half-life, albumin binding, C18 di-acid acylation, absorption for subcutaneous vs oral formulations, distribution, steady state and research limitations.
- Semaglutide Research Applications
Overview of published Semaglutide research contexts — metabolic, cardiovascular, renal, neuroinflammation/CNS and NAFLD/MASH — with a clear preclinical vs human evidence split.
- Albumin Binding and Half-Life Extension
Reusable mechanism guide explaining how fatty-acid acylation supports reversible non-covalent binding to serum albumin, and how that extends the plasma half-life of GLP-1 peptides.
Research use only
Publication information
- Published
- 2026-11-01
- Updated
- 2026-11-01
- Reviewed
- 2026-11-01
- Version
- 1.0
Revision history
- v1.02026-11-01· Editorial Team
Research Literature Programme 1 — initial publication of dedicated STEP, SURPASS and Retatrutide Phase 2 trial summaries.
Editorial standards
Content is reviewed against our editorial process for scientific accuracy, sourcing, and clarity. Read our editorial standards.
Conflict of interest
Next scheduled review: 2028-05-01. Our research methodology describes how the review is conducted.
